![]() ![]() Thus en passant captures can be made with any piece. The point of en passant was to retain the make sure the use of the two-space move did not allow the pawn to jump past attacks that would have captured it if it took two single-space moved to make the motion. I think that ANY piece can capture the pawn after the pawn's initial two-space move. ![]() IraĪccording to Wikipedia, the capture can only be made with a pawn. the pawn is not avoiding capture, it is then checking the king to win. this is the only time when en passant is overruled. ![]() Note this a opponent can not call en passant if the pawn is moved two squares passed a pawn on the fifth rank if it to call check on that opponent's king. Just to clear this up: only a pawn can capture using the en passant rule.Ī player can not call en passant on his opponent if the pawn moves two aquares past a fifth rank pawn if he is calling check on the king with the passed pawn. Also, only pawn can take a pawn "En Passant". No exception if pawn advances to check the opponent's king, the way you described. null g4 5.The en passant capture is compulsory when the player is in Zugzwang, and no other move is available on the board.Īnnon53660, annon53588, false. Next, it advances forward to preform an en passant once more. Now we pretend it promotes into an enemy pawn. First, White plays en passant and then advances to the 7th rank If you count the transformed pawns as the "same" unit after the wrong promotion, capturing en passant twice is possible. For example, Lichess's chess variant Horde Chess logicallly allows this movement. Every pawn, on its first move, has the choice of moving either one or two squares forward. However, the hypothetical legality promoting into an enemy pawn, on their first rank, was and is vague.įurthermore, there is the question of how it would move.īut we can take liberties with our imagination and assume it moves like normal, including being allowed a double-step on it's first rank. The most famous is the loophole that allowed promotion into any of the opponent's pieces. Many joke problems were and have been made to exploit ambiguities in official rulebooks. This is a thought experiment regarding the old rules of chess, all for fun.Īs aforementioned, the rules weren't so cut and dry in the 19th century. We can play fast and loose with 19th-century rulebooks, as chess was not as standardized then. While a pawn cannot capture en passant twice under the modern law of chess, it has not always been that way. This capture is only legal on the move following thisĪdvance and is called an ‘en passant’ capture. Has advanced two squares in one move from its original square mayĬapture this opponent’s pawn as though the latter had been moved only The official FIDE rules, article 1 section 3.7d states:Ī pawn attacking a square crossed by an opponent’s pawn which So, in essence, because after capturing en passant it is no longer possible for an enemy pawn to pass over your capture square, it is no longer possible for your pawn to capture en passant. My understanding is in early chess pawns could only move one space at a time, so when the 2 move rules was added they also added en passant to counterbalance the fact that you might lose a chance at capturing your opponent's pawn since he could now move over your capture square. It is not possible for a pawn to en passant twice in a row. En passant can only be played when the enemy pawn moves over your pawn's capture square during it's first move (moving 2 squares) so the answer to both condition 1 and 2 is no. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |